Tell U.S. Senators to CONFIRM Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court
Public Comments (17,200)
-
Feb 4th, 2017Janice P. from Opelousas, LA writes:
It's time for the majority REPUBLICANS to stand up to the MINORITY dumocrats. That is what the Americans voted them in office for, and that is to confirm a Judge who will support the constitution as Judge Gorsuch will. -
Feb 4th, 2017ROBERT R. from Forest, IN signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Debra C. from Colorado Springs, CO signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Debra C. from Colorado Springs, CO signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Maria E F. from Fort Worth, TX writes:
PUSH this Nominee FORWARS! STOP UR Ridiculous Antis NOW! UR holding up the Progress... 8 LONG YEARS IS ENOUGHâREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Someone from Chicago, IL writes:
God will help. Let us all pray for this appointment to go through so that we can fight for our "one nation under God".REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Alice B. from Saint Paul, MN signed.
Feb 4th, 2017David F. from Menomonee Falls, WI signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Gary N. from Lubbock, TX signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Sharon S. from Omaha, NE signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Paul S. from Sumter, SC signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Someone from Cedarville, MI writes:
I can't believe we have at long last a President that is genuinely interested in the welfare 0f the American people. Thank you President TrumpREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017John T. from Panama City, FL signed.
Feb 4th, 2017John T. from Panama City, FL signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Kathleen P. from Hendersonville, NC writes:
We need this "fair minded" man in the Supreme Court. Time for a true conservative and the law to be heardREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Roger B. from Iuka, IL signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Joseph B. from Virginia Beach, VA writes:
Senators, I strongly encourage you to vote in favor of the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. Sincerely, Joseph P. BernardREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Suzanne B. from Exton, PA signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Barron W. from Englewood, CO writes:
The interpretation of the US Constitution should NOT be based on ever-changing social or political trends, and Supreme Court Justices should NOT be appointed on the basis of their personal political / social point(s) of view. The original Constitution language, as written, is bedrock to the Law of The Land and any legal challenge or interpretation has to be measured against the original Contitution language and nothing else. Otherwise, there is no foundation of absolute truth upon which the decisions of the court are rendered, and the court's decisions become based on ever-changing attitudes or opinions that render the original constitutional document subject the whims of 12 men and women making decisions on the basis of their pesonal opinions, rather than protecting and defending the intent of the founding fathers of our nation when they drafted the Constitution.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Barron W. from Englewood, CO writes:
The interpretation of the US Constitution should NOT be based on ever-changing social or political trends, and Supreme Court Justices should NOT be appointed on the basis of their personal political / social point(s) of view. The original Constitution language, as written, is bedrock to the Law of The Land and any legal challenge or interpretation has to be measured against the original Contitution language and nothing else. Otherwise, there is no foundation of absolute truth upon which the decisions of the court are rendered, and the court's decisions become based on ever-changing attitudes or opinions that render the original constitutional document subject the whims of 12 men and women making decisions on the basis of their pesonal opinions, rather than protecting and defending the intent of the founding fathers of our nation when they drafted the Constitution.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Barron W. from Englewood, CO writes:
The interpretation of the US Constitution should NOT be based on ever-changing social or political trends, and Supreme Court Justices should NOT be appointed on the basis of their personal political / social point(s) of view. The original Constitution language, as written, is bedrock to the Law of The Land and any legal challenge or interpretation has to be measured against the original Contitution language and nothing else. Otherwise, there is no foundation of absolute truth upon which the decisions of the court are rendered, and the court's decisions become based on ever-changing attitudes or opinions that render the original constitutional document subject the whims of 12 men and women making decisions on the basis of their pesonal opinions, rather than protecting and defending the intent of the founding fathers of our nation when they drafted the Constitution.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Barron W. from Englewood, CO writes:
The interpretation of the US Constitution should NOT be based on ever-changing social or political trends, and Supreme Court Justices should NOT be appointed on the basis of their personal political / social point(s) of view. The original Constitution language, as written, is bedrock to the Law of The Land and any legal challenge or interpretation has to be measured against the original Contitution language and nothing else. Otherwise, there is no foundation of absolute truth upon which the decisions of the court are rendered, and the court's decisions become based on ever-changing attitudes or opinions that render the original constitutional document subject the whims of 12 men and women making decisions on the basis of their pesonal opinions, rather than protecting and defending the intent of the founding fathers of our nation when they drafted the Constitution.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Elaine B. from Alfred, ME writes:
I urge you to vote for Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Someone from Jefferson, TX writes:
Congressmen should be thinking about doing the people's business, not their agendas. Let's face it, the "United States" of America elected Trump. The cities that went for Hillary do not represent the majority of AmericaREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Barron W. from Englewood, CO writes:
The interpretation of the US Constitution should NOT be based on ever-changing social or political trends, and Supreme Court Justices should NOT be appointed on the basis of their personal political / social point(s) of view. The original Constitution language, as written, is bedrock to the Law of The Land and any legal challenge or interpretation has to be measured against the original Contitution language and nothing else. Otherwise, there is no foundation of absolute truth upon which the decisions of the court are rendered, and the court's decisions become based on ever-changing attitudes or opinions that render the original constitutional document subject the whims of 12 men and women making decisions on the basis of their pesonal opinions, rather than protecting and defending the intent of the founding fathers of our nation when they drafted the Constitution.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Someone from Phoenix, AZ signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Someone from Okatie, SC signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Someone from New Iberia, LA writes:
He was good enough for 2006 what it the problem now!!! Not left wing enough is most likely the problem.. Tell Dems we are watching closely , their stalling posture with slowing the People Will down... another election is coming quickly and we will vote again in numbers to turn this country back more to right.... Enough is Enough... If confirmation of cabinet isn't done by one week shut down government, until the Dems get the message... Need Leadership to move forward,.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Robert E. from Omaha, NE signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Mickey B. from Portland, OR signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Wendy T. from Phoenix, AZ writes:
You don't represent me! How dare you oppose the Founding Principles of the United States? What gives you the right to destroy our government and our country? If you aren't going to stand for the USA, then get the hell out of the way, you traitors!REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Someone from LATROBE, PA writes:
We need to vote out all that oppose this judge! !!REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Someone from Edisto Island, SC signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Dave H. from New Albany, PA signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Someone from San Diego, CA writes:
after years of listening to your drone of" republicans are obstructing us", here you go and be obstructionists. Other than" he is not in my mainstream" what is actually wrong. You are to the extreme left side. The American voters are actually in the middle or slightly right of center. Harry , the whore, Reid already settled this. Either vote for Neil Gorcuch or face the music of 51 plus gets us a new justice. You sleazy side set this up so come cacaREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017Someone from Hamilton, OH signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Bill R. from Malvern, PA writes:
Schumer, Biden, Clinton, Kerry Feinstein, & Obama approved him in 2006. Gorsuch hasn't changed. Why do you think Schumer And Feinstein have?REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 4th, 2017David W. from Erie, PA signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Carol P. from Sugar Land, TX signed.
Feb 4th, 2017Frederick M. from Lake Saint Louis, MO writes:
Judge Gorsuch hasn't changes since 2006 when he was approved in 2006.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, Cancel
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.